Stephen Musings

Not on my merit but by His Grace,

An Advertorial goes awry: Lessons Learned

The one-page marketing feature published on 24 January 2025 in almost all Malayalam dailies sparked significant public outcry, prompting the newspapers to issue clarifications or apologies the following day.

This incident serves as a live case study for marketing students, highlighting a marketing communication strategy, overlooked in marketing classrooms: Advertorial.

What is an Advertorial?

An advertorial is a form of advertising designed to resemble editorial content within a publication. The term combines “advertisement” and “editorial,” reflecting its dual nature.             

 Advertorial = Advertisement + Editorial

Advertorials are crafted to blend seamlessly with non-promotional content, such as magazine articles, blog posts, or news stories, while subtly promoting a product, service, or brand. Unlike traditional advertisements, advertorials aim to engage readers by offering value through informative content, helpful insights, or storytelling, making them less overtly promotional. By mimicking the tone and format of editorial content, advertorials are intended to appear neutral and unbiased, thereby encouraging readers to read the content and thus assimilate the message underlying it.

The case on our focus is that of Jain Deemed-to-be University, which organized a “Summit of the Future” and published a full-page advertorial to promote the summit.

White and red lines were drawn to attract attention
Red lines were drawn to attract attention

Above are the relevant pages of the two leading Malayalam dailies, Malayala Manorama and Mathrubhumi. The advertorial was thoughtfully designed, seamlessly integrating with the respective layouts and fonts of the newspapers. The designation as a marketing feature was prominently displayed at the top right, highlighted in red circles. The theme was futuristic, with the date prominently stated as “24 January 2050” in Manorama, alongside a cautionary note at the top right in Manorama and at the bottom middle in Mathrubhumi.

The content, conceptualized and written by the Jain University team, included intriguing news items such as ‘Inauguration of the first ocean city, Oceanus,’ ‘Withdrawal of paper currency to shift to digital currency from February,’ ‘Interglobal Football Cup to be shared by Earth and Mars,’ ‘First robo-minister in Kerala,’ ‘AI saves 30,000 lives from landslides through timely prediction,’ and ‘UN resolution for one world, one people, leading to a borderless world.’ These topics were undeniably captivating.

However, the advertorial sparked confusion among readers. Many initially mistook it for real news, leading to widespread panic. Upon realizing it was a marketing feature, frustration and anger followed. Social media erupted with trolls, heated debates, and derogatory remarks directed at the publications.

In response, on 25 January, Jain University in Malayala Manorama issued a clarification, that it was not a piece of news but an imaginative one as part of an advertisement by the University.

Deepika went a step further by unconditionally apologizing on 25 January.

What was intended as a creative and engaging advertorial backfired, generating a negative response that could affect future newspaper subscriptions.

One particular news item in the advertorial—regarding the withdrawal of paper currency and its replacement with digital currency from 1 February 2050—drew severe criticism. Many misinterpreted it as a policy set for 2025, triggering alarm, especially in light of the hardships faced during the 2016 demonetization of Rs 1000 currency notes. Although the news was framed as futuristic, its implications felt immediate, fueling the uproar.

Interestingly, other imaginative elements within the advertorial piqued curiosity, and upon closer inspection, their fictional nature became apparent. Many readers eventually appreciated the content and would have taken note of the theme of the summit. But the overall response underscored the risks of such campaigns, where creative marketing can easily be misconstrued, leading to a backlash.

As a corrective measure, Jain University published a full-page marketing feature on 28 January, presenting an actual report on the Future Summit. This time, the marketing feature was prominently labeled at the top right and distinguished from editorial content by a grey-bordered layout, making it clearly identifiable as an advertisement rather than an advertorial. How many of the newspaper’s subscribers would have read the page? That is the superiority of advertorials over advertisements. The subtle difference between the two carries an inherent risk of misunderstanding, which can undermine credibility and trust.

Lessons learned: A well-designed advertorial lost its impact and led to negative repercussions due to a poorly conceived and untimely piece on digital currency. Brilliant ideas/strategies can backfire due to a minor slip in the execution. This incident serves as a reminder of the delicate balance required in marketing strategies to ensure clarity and maintain audience trust.

10 responses to “An Advertorial goes awry: Lessons Learned”

  1. Very interesting…..a classic example of ‘history repeating itself ‘ even as ‘life imitates art’.

    A cool campaign as it would have been conceived getting derailed by reaction beyond expectations.

    History repeats itself ?

    There is a famous incident from the 1930s, when the great actor and director Orson Welles’ narration from HG Wells work The War of the World on radio creates widespread panic on the streets with it’s almost life like description of Martian invasion and aliens. The director and studio had to face a lot of flak and had many public explanations to do.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds_(1938_radio_drama)

    Marketing always runs the risk of a hit or a miss, public direct to consumers all the more so. In these sensory saturated times, there is also a desperation to capture attention.

    Couple of upsides- The visibility for the event would now be multifold, anger not withstanding. Also, news cycles are so fast today that the negative sentiments fade quickly too.

    Interesting phenomenon overall.

    A very instructive post by a marketing Professor. Thanks.

    Like

    1. Thanks Binu
      You have livened the discussion

      Like

  2. This advertisement was not in good spirit. It showcased the real charector of the advertiser and the media.The disclaimers and lame excuses cant bring back credibility anymore, as we are pumped with disinformation by many greedy and unscrupulous players. Werent you puzzled for a moment before you realised it ???

    Like

  3. Elizabeth Joseph Avatar
    Elizabeth Joseph

    Interesting how information could be misinterpreted when the readers are not reading it correctly. Also, I noticed an error in the advertisement for Jain University: Isn’t it supposed to be CHANGE, not CHANE as given in Malayala Manorama front page towards the bottom corner on the right?

    Like

  4. Prof Titus Varkey, Former Principal K G College, Pampady

    “👌 Super analysis, sir. Any message or comment with a tinge of negative shade becomes ‘news’ for the current visual media . I think Jain is happy as the surprise created did work and produced good publicity.”

    Like

  5. Very informative article

    At first glance at the newspapers, this could easily be misunderstood as real news as normally advertisements are put in newspapers as display ads (in first page) and advertorials normally comes in separate news supplements. This Jain university ad is clearly misleading the public and just mentioning it as marketing feature (that too in small letters and in manglish) is not enough. Newspapers should avoid this kind of advertorials on the first page.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. […] 25 January 2025, major newspapers in Kerala carried an advertorial on their front pages, styled as an imagined news feature from the year 2050. While a corner warning […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Elizabeth Joseph Cancel reply